That Named Pragmatism Idealism

Whether what was said when SBY and Bakrie meet. The end result has been briefed more than enough to say that Golkar had many weapons to remain visible idealist in the coalition, but also remain visible even feared by the government to act counter productive to the supporters of the ruling coalition. Idealist because it looks very dashing against the cancellation of the use right of inquiry taxes, stood firm vis a vis the coalition members who accompany the ruling party.
Aware of the significance of the issue of tax mafia, it seems clear that Golkar did not want to lose the moment to stand back a rhythm with the public who want a voice mega corruption scandals within the taxation is completed immediately. Whether in a realistic political position or profit-taking on the government for the deterioration of the image of this case, Golkar actually acting outside of its historical character this time, her hips against the wishes of the ruling parties and their supporters which is actually a friend of a coalition.
Before the meeting SBY and Ical, as familiar Bakrie, chairman of the party bearing the banyan often boasted not fear his cadres were expelled from the plots of United Indonesia Cabinet and oppositional stand against the government. He argued very simple, the opposition is a political choice of the noble and honorable if Golkar felt it was uncomfortable being in the coalition. But behind the pretext justifikatif impression of arrogance that easily caught the runner up party which at times can make a commotion in the coalition government and could undermine the focus of public attention in the paw with populist policies.
Golkar's bargaining position is high, but the number of votes and the election results and the mastery of seats in Parliament, Golkar also has much in common with Democrats. Both parties seem just a fenced boundaries of mere political interest, there is almost no ideological contradictions and political beliefs sharp dispute as a fundamental difference between Democrats and the MCC. This fact brings a difficult choice for SBY and the government in finding a replacement if the Golkar coalition members resigned or removed from the coalition. On the other hand, it also brings blessings of freedom to the Golkar in producing an acting-acting is considered favorable political party.
If SBY intends to fire a membership coalition of Golkar, the political left and the choice may be ideologically for the Democratic Party is the PDIP. However, a close friend PDIP intention has always been tripped up by the chairman of the party bearing the head of the bull. Remnants of past feuds when Megawati was handcuffed from behind by SBY seemed to have not ended, so that none of the signals from the chairman agreed to surface. Although the board level terrace PDIP own schism between those who support the choice to join the coalition (often called a stronghold Taufik Pack) and the fanatics on the attitude of Megawati, namely choosing the chairman interpret silence as a sign of disapproval.
This dilemma makes the intention to punish Golkar impressed SBY-nonsense and sheer bluffs. Removing Golkar coalition amid uncertainty of support from the PDIP means weakening the government's position to the front and the opposition's line which was originally only acted PDIP, Gerindra, and Hanura. While the political nature of SBY and Democrats not to add rows of offense, but to embrace anyone who is interested to join the coalition for the sake of more easily poured policies that would make SBY name engraved in gold ink during the final period. Then, intentional or not, the results support the joint will indirectly tercandra by the public as "the performance of Democrats who assisted other coalition members, not the performance of coalition members who fought desperately to support the Democrats." In short, the popularity of Democrats believed to be more radiant than supporters of other parties because the president is the Democratic nominee. For Democrats, this projection would very likely occur if SBY-Boediono successfully incised gold ink at the end of his presidency.
Therefore, a huge political risk that will be smitten SBY and Golkar Party Democrats to let the opposition take the option. Performance and plans and government programs will be disrupted due to the growing line of non-coalition, while the tenure of the president kept walking. If Golkar managed to break the concentration of government, this would be a bad omen for the government programs in the future because the cabinet apart pairs will cause delays or even failures in the programs of the department, is also not a matter of adjustment of leadership within the organization that sold at the ministry.
In consideration tersebutlah can finally understand the results of SBY and Ical meeting recently. Any concessions received by Golkar is the fruit of a strategic political position he played during this time, despite the card being played Golkar logo "horse-trading of political pragmatism or idealism mere party interests". Substantially, this political stance as obviously no different from the leadership of former Vice President Jusuf Kalla that often take the political steps beyond the control of the authorities, but again received an apology from the authorities and return the liquid in some time.
But on the other hand, the tendency to always forgive the Golkar has encouraged the perception that the ruling establishment "favors" in the middle of the Golkar party other government supporters. Though Golkar dissent anyway also no different from what the MCC, but the approach and lobbying to woo back much more aggressively Golkar impressed and excited. SBY's political pragmatism seems very viscous if the problems faced by forcing Yudhoyono and Democrats vis a vis the Golkar Party openly. Threats and warnings to members of the coalition opposed to such ruling does not apply for Golkar.
The results of SBY and Ical meeting has also made retroactively MCC intention to be prepared out of the coalition. Statements that read "stay together and support the government" soon infect the mouth at high levels, MCC. Matter of practical politics has also penetrated the political considerations of MCC, especially if the best cadres should lose the moment to reap organizational experience in the bureaucracy. PDIP stand together outside the government is certainly not a rational political choice for the MCC. Fundamentally, the government opposed any move, confirmed by the PDI-P will be across from MCC regarding the rationale and objectives of the action. It would be different if the PKS and Golkar both resigned, both parties tend to be friendly familiar inside or outside the government. Golkar political pragmatism can always make a difference with the MCC to a liquid and intimate.
In short, warning SBY will certainly apply for MCC, MCC is expected in the future will follow the rules outlined coalition leader. But unlike even inversely with Golkar, it is apparent in political communication on both sides, Demokratlah a lot of solidity in order to accommodate the desires of the Golkar coalition is maintained as before, whereas the political praxis Demokratlah who feel betrayed by Golkar in the parliament.
The dispute broke down over issues of taxes have been disbursed questionnaire rights of political idealism of each party into pragmatic steps, bury the right of inquiry into the isolation room farthest taxes, and energy drain which was originally intended to prove the promises and the current political campaign. And political idealism was finally called pragmatism, it's up to any party symbol and name.